Top
Search 닫기

Case Report

Split Viewer

Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2024; 47(4): 289-295

Published online December 30, 2024

https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2024.47.4.289

© The Korean Socitety of Veterinary Service

Nephrectomy with hydronephrosis following ovariohysterectomy using surgical ligation clips in a dog

Sung Min Kim 1†, Ho Hyun Kwak 1,2†, Heung Myong Woo 1*

1Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
2Department of Companion Animal Industry, College of Natural and Life Sciences, Daegu University, Gyeongsan 38453, Korea

Correspondence to : Heung Myong Woo
E-mail: woohm@kangwon.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2105-3913
These first two authors contributed equally to this work.

Received: September 26, 2024; Revised: November 22, 2024; Accepted: November 22, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

A 7-year-old spayed female poodle presented with abdominal distension. Initial tests included a complete blood count, serum biochemistry panel, coagulation test, radiography, and ultrasound. As an additional test, a computed tomography urography was performed. Based on the ultrasound and CT findings, an exploratory laparotomy was performed to remove the ligation clip that appeared to be causing hydronephrosis and hydroureter in the left kidney. A ligation clip obstructing the proximal ureter of the left kidney was discovered. All clips, including the obstructing one, were removed, and a nephrectomy was performed. Gross examination of the kidney revealed almost no remaining renal parenchyma. Histopathological results showed compressive necrosis of the glomerular tissue, with no evidence of tumor or inflammation. The dog remained in good overall condition for 12 months postoperatively, with no abnormalities detected in blood tests. Hemorrhage and ureteral injury are major complications of ovariohysterectomy, preventable with proper visualization, awareness of the proximal ureter’s proximity to the uterine body, and careful tissue handling. This case report describes a rare instance of ureteral obstruction caused by a surgical ligation clip used during an ovariohysterectomy, which led to unilateral hydronephrosis in a dog.

Keywords Hydronephrosis, Nephrectomy, Ureter injury, Ovariohysterectomy, Dog

In veterinary medicine, ovariohysterectomy (OVH) is considered a simple and safe procedure; however, there are several risks and complications (Pollari et al., 1996). Common complications include hemorrhage and accidental ligation or trauma to the ureter (Adin, 2011). Hemorrhage is the most common intraoperative complication in OVH, and to prevent this, proper vessel ligation techniques are required (Bohling, 2020). Accidental ligation or injury to the ureter can occur during ligation of the ovary or uterine stump, potentially leading to hydronephrosis (Howe, 2006). To prevent ureteral injury, the anatomical location of the ureter and its proximity to the surgical site must be recognized (Adin, 2011). Hydronephrosis is caused by partial or complete obstruction of the upper urinary tract, leading to progressive dilation of the renal pelvis and ultimately causing compression and atrophy of the renal parenchyma (Şahal et al., 2005). It is important to confirm whether the obstruction is unilateral or bilateral to determine the cause and prognosis of hydronephrosis, and to identify the path from the ureter to the bladder to find the source of the obstruction (Wajczyk et al., 2020). This study reports a rare case of iatrogenic unilateral hydronephrosis caused by a ligation surgical clip used in the process of controlling hemorrhage. It highlights the importance of delicate surgical techniques and postoperative imaging to prevent ureteral injury and subsequent hydronephrosis during OVH surgery.

A 7-year-old spayed female poodle (weighing 3.1 kg) was presented with abdominal distension. The dog had undergone spaying surgery at a local animal hospital approximately two years ago. The owner reported that the abdominal distension had been present since that time. On physical examination, the dog was active, with an enlarged abdomen, but no abdominal pain was noted. Initial diagnostic tests included a complete blood count (CBC), serum biochemistry panel, electrolyte tests, and coagulation tests (PT, APTT), all of which were within normal limits (Table 1). The bacterial culture of the urine obtained via cystocentesis was negative.

Table 1 . Complete blood count (CBC), electrolyte levels, serum chemistry, and coagulation test results at the initial visit

Blood analysisNameResultReference range
CBCWhite blood cell count (K/μL)
Neutrophils (K/μL)
Lymphocytes (K/μL)
Monocytes (K/μL)
Eosinophils (K/μL)
Basophils (K/μL)
Red blood cell count (M/μL)
Hemoglobin (G/D)
MCV (fL)
MCHC (g/dL)
11.39
9.00
1.50
0.56
0.30
0.03
8.26
19.5
66.1
35.7
5∼16.7
2.9∼11.64
1∼5
0.16∼1.12
0.06∼1.29
0∼0.1
5.6∼8.8
13.1∼20.5
61∼73.5
32∼37.9
ElectrolytesPlatelets (K/μL)
Na (mEq/L)
K (mEq/L)
Cl (mEq/L)
311
150
4.6
112
148∼484
144∼160
3.5∼5.8
109∼122
Serum chemistryGlucose (mg/dL)
Total protein (G/D)
Albumin (G/D)
Globulin (G/D)
AST (U/L)
ALT (U/L)
GGT (U/L)
ALP (U/L)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
Phosphorus (MG)
Amylase (U/L)
96
6.4
3.2
3.2
43
99
1
99
0.7
21
1.1
2.9
651
74∼143
5.2∼8.2
2.3∼4
2.5∼4.5
0∼50
10∼130
0∼11
23∼212
0∼0.9
7∼27
0.5∼1.8
2.5∼6.8
500∼1,500
Coagulation testPT (sec)
APTT (sec)
81
14
60∼93
11∼14

MCV, mean ccorpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time.



On thoracic and abdominal radiographs, six radiopaque metallic objects, presumed to be ligation surgical clips, were observed (Fig. 1), and the left kidney was significantly enlarged compared to the right, displacing the intestines. The size of the right kidney was within normal limits. Abdominal ultrasound revealed left kidney enlargement, renal cortical atrophy, renal pelvis dilation, and proximal left ureteral dilation, confirming hydronephrosis and hydroureter (Fig. 2). The remaining ultrasound findings were clinically normal.

Fig. 1.Abdominal radiographs images of lateral (A) and ventrodorsal (B) recumbency view. A round mass (edges marked by arrows) is observed in the mid-to-left caudal abdomen. Six metallic surgical ligation clips are visible.

Fig. 2.Ultrasonographic images of the left kidney and left proximal ureter. (A) Dorsal view of the left kidney showing severe hydronephrosis with marked enlargement, and the renal parenchyma is almost completely lost. (B) Dilation of the left proximal ureter (arrow) is observed.

A computed tomography (CT) urography was performed to further assess anatomical abnormalities and evaluate kidney function. The dog was positioned in sternal recumbency, and an iodine-based contrast agent (2.5 mL/kg, Omnipaque; GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ) was administered intravenously before imaging. On the CT scan, the left kidney was severely enlarged (5.3×4.7×7.3 cm), and loss of renal parenchyma with severe hydronephrosis was observed (Fig. 3). The proximal left ureter (12 mm) was dilated, and the distal ureter was not visualized, with no contrast enhancement seen. The CT scan also revealed metallic surgical clips, but due to metal artifacts, image quality was compromised. No abnormalities were found in the right kidney, ureter, or bladder. Based on these findings, surgical treatment for hydronephrosis was recommended, including the removal of the surgical clip and exploratory laparotomy to clarify the diagnosis and address the left kidney’s hydronephrosis.

Fig. 3.Images of computed tomography urography taken preoperatively. Coronal (A), saggital (B), and transverse (C) section of CT scan demonstrating the enlarged left kidney (asterisk) and surgical ligation clips (arrow).

One week later, surgery was performed. The dog was sedated with butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg, IV) (Butophan Inj., 1 mg/mL, Myung Moon, Korea) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg, IV) (Midazolam Inj, 1 mg/mL, Bukwang Pharm, Korea), induced with propofol (5 mg/kg, IV) (Anepol Inj., 10 mg/mL, Hana Pharm, Korea), and maintained on isoflurane with oxygen. Cefazolin (22 mg/kg, IV) (cefazoline Inj., 1 g, Chongkundang, Korea) was administered at the time of induction. Upon exploration of the abdomen, palpation of the left kidney revealed no renal parenchyma, and a fluctuant, encapsulated left kidney. While exposing the kidney for removal, surgical clips adhered to surrounding fatty tissue below the kidney was identified. Since almost no renal parenchyma remained on imaging, and severe enlargement of the left kidney was causing displacement of adjacent organs, a left nephrectomy was performed (Fig. 4A). The renal blood vessels and ureter were ligated, and the kidney was excised. A metallic surgical clip firmly adhered to the surrounding tissue was also removed (Fig. 4B). The right kidney and bladder appeared normal on gross inspection. No free fluid was observed in the abdominal cavity. The abdomen was flushed and routinely sutured, and the dog recovered uneventfully from anesthesia.

Fig. 4.Operative and postoperative images of the removed hydronephrotic kidney. (A) The cystic kidney is observed. (B) Close-up image of the surgical ligation clip (arrow). (C) The excised kidney and the dilated proximal ureter (arrow). (D) Ligation clip presumed to have obstructed the proximal ureter (arrow).

On gross examination, the excised kidney showed severe atrophy of both the renal cortex and medulla. The kidney was generally enlarged, and on sagittal sectioning, only a thin renal capsule was observed. A surgical clip, typically used for vascular ligation, was found, along with another clip, suspected to have ligated the ureter, was identified (Fig. 4C, 4D). It is presumed that these clips were used to control hemorrhage during the OVH performed two years prior. The kidney tissue was submitted for histopathological examination.

The dog was hospitalized for two days postoperatively and received fluid therapy. For the subsequent seven days, the dog was prescribed tramadol (5 mg/kg, q 12 h, p.o.) (Tridol Retard Tab., 100 mg, Yuhan, Korea) and cephalexin (25 mg/kg, q 12 h, p.o.) (Falexin Cap., Dong Wha Pharm, Korea). On postoperative day 12, the skin sutures were removed, and the dog’s vital signs were normal with no abnormalities detected in its overall physical condition. Serum biochemical analysis revealed a creatinine level of 0.6 mg/dL (reference range: 0.5∼1.8) and a blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level of 16 mg/dL (reference range: 7∼27). Histopathological examination showed glomerular loss in the cortical area and separation of the cortex and medulla due to edema. Hydronephrosis was confirmed, with no signs of neoplasia or inflammation.

On postoperative day 120, no abnormalities were noted in the CBC or serum biochemical tests. One year after the surgery, the dog continued to maintain excellent health. BUN and creatinine levels remained within normal limits, as they had been preoperatively.

Ovariohysterectomy (OVH) is considered a relatively simple procedure frequently performed in small animal clinical practice (Bencharif et al., 2010; Adin, 2011). Considering the high frequency of this procedure, it is unsurprising that a wide spectrum of complications has been reported. These include hemorrhage, wound healing disorders, ovarian remnant syndrome, stump pyometra, ureteral injury, gossypiboma, and urinary incontinence (Adin, 2011; Bohling, 2020). Among these, hemorrhage is one of the most commonly encountered intraoperative complications during OVH, often occurring due to rupture of the ovarian pedicle or improper ligation of the ovarian pedicle vessels (Berzon, 1979). Several retrospective studies suggest that hemorrhage during OVH rarely leads to severe morbidity or mortality (Burrow et al., 2005; Shaver et al., 2019). Nonetheless, when intraoperative hemorrhage occurs, identifying and ligating the bleeding vessels should always be ensured, as this complication can be life-threatening and is one of the potential causes of mortality following OVH in dogs (Pearson, 1973; Bohling, 2020). Internal bleeding from inadequately ligated vessels and the resulting hypovolemic shock can be fatal (Pearson, 1973). Proper management of intraoperative hemorrhage involves identifying and correcting the source of bleeding. Additional incisions and the use of self-retaining retractors to ensure adequate visualization may be necessary to resolve the bleeding quickly and definitively, thus minimizing the risk of unintended complications, such as ureteral injury (Bohling, 2020). In the presented case, the dog underwent an OVH two years ago, during which unexpected hemorrhage appears to have occurred around the left ovarian pedicle. Given that ligation clips were observed exclusively around the left renal region, it is presumed that hemorrhage occurred near the left ovarian pedicle, and multiple surgical ligation clips were used to control it.

Direct ureteral obstruction typically occurs when the ureter is inadvertently included in a surgical ligature (Adin, 2011). The proximal ureter is more often involved due to its close anatomical relationship with the uterine body (Mehl and Kyles, 2003). This situation is similar in humans, where most ureteral injuries occur during gynecological surgeries (Elliott and McAninch, 2006). Such complications can also be prevented through careful identification of the uterine horns, uterine stump, and cervix before ligation (Howe, 2006). Despite this anatomical proximity to the urogenital tract, reports of ureteral injuries associated with OVH in dogs are limited (Adin, 2011). It is likely that this complication occurs more frequently and goes undetected, as unilateral ureteral obstruction in previously healthy animals does not typically result in azotemia (Adin, 2011). Additionally, the true incidence of ureteral injury related to OVH remains unclear, as many studies evaluating spay-related complications do not include routine abdominal imaging (Cavrenne and Mai, 2009; Mathews, 2017). In this case, it is suspected that a surgical clip used during the OVH two years prior caused an iatrogenic obstruction, leading to complete ureteral occlusion. This unilateral upper urinary tract obstruction, although causing one kidney to become non-functional, did not result in azotemia or clinical symptoms, as the contralateral kidney remained functional.

Treatment for ureteral obstruction depends on renal function and whether the obstruction is unilateral or bilateral (Mesquita et al., 2015). Unilateral lesions, if classified as end-stage hydronephrosis and the contralateral kidney is functional, can be treated with nephrectomy (Mesquita et al., 2015; Griffin et al., 2021). If preserving renal function is critical for survival, ureteral surgery may be necessary (Mesquita et al., 2015). In this case, given the absence of clinical symptoms, lack of azotemia on biochemical analysis, and the severely diminished function of the remaining kidney, nephrectomy was indicated. Histopathological findings were consistent with severe kidney atrophy along with hydronephrosis.

The main limitation of the case we reported is the uncertainty regarding the extent to which the nephrectomy contributed to the patient’s overall clinical symptoms. According to the owner, aside from abdominal distention following the OVH, there were no other significant clinical signs. Preoperative physical examination and hematological evaluations revealed no abnormalities. However, there is a risk that the hydronephrotic kidney could become infected or progress to more severe conditions such as pyonephrosis (Szatmari et al., 2001). Therefore, if the contralateral kidney is functional and the hydronephrosis is at an end stage, a preemptive nephrectomy may be indicated to prevent such severe complications.

Hemorrhage and ureteral injury are major complications during ovariohysterectomy. To prevent these, proper surgical field visualization, thorough knowledge of anatomical structures, and delicate tissue handling techniques are required. Additionally, routine abdominal imaging tests are recommended postoperatively. In cases of unilateral hydronephrosis, if the contralateral ureter and kidney are functionally normal, the prognosis after nephrectomy is generally favorable. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first reported case in which a ligation clip used during a neutering procedure led to unilateral hydronephrosis, which was subsequently surgically resected.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  1. Adin CA. 2011. Complications of ovariohysterectomy and orchiectomy in companion animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 41(5):1023-1039.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Bencharif D, Amirat L, Tainturier D. 2010. Ovariohysterectomy in the bitch. Obstet Gynecol Int 2010:542693.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Berzon J. 1979. Complications of elective ovariohysterectomies in the dog and cat at a teaching institution: clinical review of 853 cases. Vet Surg 8(3):89-91.
    CrossRef
  4. Bohling MW. 2020. Complications in spay and neuter surgery. In: White S, ed. High-Quality, High-Volume Spay and Neuter and Other Shelter Surgeries. Wiley-Blackwell; 2020: 339-361.
    CrossRef
  5. Burrow R, Cripps P. 2005. Complications observed during and after ovariohysterectomy of 142 bitches at a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Rec 157(26):829-833.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Cavrenne R and Mai W. 2009. Time-resolved renal contrast-enhanced MRA in normal dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50(1):58-64.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Elliott SP and McAninch JW. 2006. Ureteral injuries: external and iatrogenic. Urologic Clinics 33(1):55-66.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Griffin MA, Culp WTN, Munro MJL, Wanamaker MW. 2021. Surgical treatment of retroiliac ectopic ureters with secondary hydronephrosis and hydroureter in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 258(7):740-747.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Howe LM. 2006. Surgical methods of contraception and sterilization. Theriogenology 66(3):500-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Mathews K. 2017. Ureters, 2202-2218. In: Johnston SA, Tobias KM. Veterinary surgery: Small animal. 2nd ed. Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis, Misouri.
  11. Mehl M and Kyles A. 2003. Ureteroureterostomy after proximal ureteric injury during an ovariohysterectomy in a dog. Vet Rec 153(15):469-470.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Mesquita LR, Rahal SC, Matsubara LM, Mamprim MJ, Foschini CR, Kano WT. 2015. Bilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureter after ovariohysterectomy using nylon cable tie: a case report. Vet Med 60(1):52-56.
    CrossRef
  13. Pearson H. 1973. The complications of ovariohysterectomy in the bitch. J Small Anim Pract 14(5):257-266.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Pollari FL, Bonnett BN, Bamsey SC, Allen DG. 1996. Postoperative complications of elective surgeries in dogs and cats determined by examining electronic and paper medical records. J Am Vet Med Assoc 208(11):1882-1886.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Shaver SL, Hofmeister EH. 2019. Factors affecting the duration of anesthesia and surgery of canine and feline gonadectomies performed by veterinary students in a year-long preclinical surgery laboratory. Vet Surg 48(3):352-359.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Szatmari V, Manczur F. 2001. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage for treatment of pyonephrosis in two dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 218(11):1796-1799.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Şahal M, Haziroğlu R, Beyaz L. 2005. Bilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureter in a German shepherd dog. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg 52:193-196.
  18. Wajczyk T, Von Muhlen R, de Mello JR, de Carvalho TF, de Abreu Pereira J, Teixeira L, Effting AC, Coutinho DCN, Teixeira WT. 2020. Nephrectomy associated with right renomegaly in a dog affected by hydronephrosis. PUBVET 14(10):MN6664.
    CrossRef

Article

Case Report

Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2024; 47(4): 289-295

Published online December 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2024.47.4.289

Copyright © The Korean Socitety of Veterinary Service.

Nephrectomy with hydronephrosis following ovariohysterectomy using surgical ligation clips in a dog

Sung Min Kim 1†, Ho Hyun Kwak 1,2†, Heung Myong Woo 1*

1Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
2Department of Companion Animal Industry, College of Natural and Life Sciences, Daegu University, Gyeongsan 38453, Korea

Correspondence to:Heung Myong Woo
E-mail: woohm@kangwon.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2105-3913
These first two authors contributed equally to this work.

Received: September 26, 2024; Revised: November 22, 2024; Accepted: November 22, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

A 7-year-old spayed female poodle presented with abdominal distension. Initial tests included a complete blood count, serum biochemistry panel, coagulation test, radiography, and ultrasound. As an additional test, a computed tomography urography was performed. Based on the ultrasound and CT findings, an exploratory laparotomy was performed to remove the ligation clip that appeared to be causing hydronephrosis and hydroureter in the left kidney. A ligation clip obstructing the proximal ureter of the left kidney was discovered. All clips, including the obstructing one, were removed, and a nephrectomy was performed. Gross examination of the kidney revealed almost no remaining renal parenchyma. Histopathological results showed compressive necrosis of the glomerular tissue, with no evidence of tumor or inflammation. The dog remained in good overall condition for 12 months postoperatively, with no abnormalities detected in blood tests. Hemorrhage and ureteral injury are major complications of ovariohysterectomy, preventable with proper visualization, awareness of the proximal ureter’s proximity to the uterine body, and careful tissue handling. This case report describes a rare instance of ureteral obstruction caused by a surgical ligation clip used during an ovariohysterectomy, which led to unilateral hydronephrosis in a dog.

Keywords: Hydronephrosis, Nephrectomy, Ureter injury, Ovariohysterectomy, Dog

INTRODUCTION

In veterinary medicine, ovariohysterectomy (OVH) is considered a simple and safe procedure; however, there are several risks and complications (Pollari et al., 1996). Common complications include hemorrhage and accidental ligation or trauma to the ureter (Adin, 2011). Hemorrhage is the most common intraoperative complication in OVH, and to prevent this, proper vessel ligation techniques are required (Bohling, 2020). Accidental ligation or injury to the ureter can occur during ligation of the ovary or uterine stump, potentially leading to hydronephrosis (Howe, 2006). To prevent ureteral injury, the anatomical location of the ureter and its proximity to the surgical site must be recognized (Adin, 2011). Hydronephrosis is caused by partial or complete obstruction of the upper urinary tract, leading to progressive dilation of the renal pelvis and ultimately causing compression and atrophy of the renal parenchyma (Şahal et al., 2005). It is important to confirm whether the obstruction is unilateral or bilateral to determine the cause and prognosis of hydronephrosis, and to identify the path from the ureter to the bladder to find the source of the obstruction (Wajczyk et al., 2020). This study reports a rare case of iatrogenic unilateral hydronephrosis caused by a ligation surgical clip used in the process of controlling hemorrhage. It highlights the importance of delicate surgical techniques and postoperative imaging to prevent ureteral injury and subsequent hydronephrosis during OVH surgery.

CASE

A 7-year-old spayed female poodle (weighing 3.1 kg) was presented with abdominal distension. The dog had undergone spaying surgery at a local animal hospital approximately two years ago. The owner reported that the abdominal distension had been present since that time. On physical examination, the dog was active, with an enlarged abdomen, but no abdominal pain was noted. Initial diagnostic tests included a complete blood count (CBC), serum biochemistry panel, electrolyte tests, and coagulation tests (PT, APTT), all of which were within normal limits (Table 1). The bacterial culture of the urine obtained via cystocentesis was negative.

Table 1 . Complete blood count (CBC), electrolyte levels, serum chemistry, and coagulation test results at the initial visit.

Blood analysisNameResultReference range
CBCWhite blood cell count (K/μL)
Neutrophils (K/μL)
Lymphocytes (K/μL)
Monocytes (K/μL)
Eosinophils (K/μL)
Basophils (K/μL)
Red blood cell count (M/μL)
Hemoglobin (G/D)
MCV (fL)
MCHC (g/dL)
11.39
9.00
1.50
0.56
0.30
0.03
8.26
19.5
66.1
35.7
5∼16.7
2.9∼11.64
1∼5
0.16∼1.12
0.06∼1.29
0∼0.1
5.6∼8.8
13.1∼20.5
61∼73.5
32∼37.9
ElectrolytesPlatelets (K/μL)
Na (mEq/L)
K (mEq/L)
Cl (mEq/L)
311
150
4.6
112
148∼484
144∼160
3.5∼5.8
109∼122
Serum chemistryGlucose (mg/dL)
Total protein (G/D)
Albumin (G/D)
Globulin (G/D)
AST (U/L)
ALT (U/L)
GGT (U/L)
ALP (U/L)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
Phosphorus (MG)
Amylase (U/L)
96
6.4
3.2
3.2
43
99
1
99
0.7
21
1.1
2.9
651
74∼143
5.2∼8.2
2.3∼4
2.5∼4.5
0∼50
10∼130
0∼11
23∼212
0∼0.9
7∼27
0.5∼1.8
2.5∼6.8
500∼1,500
Coagulation testPT (sec)
APTT (sec)
81
14
60∼93
11∼14

MCV, mean ccorpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time..



On thoracic and abdominal radiographs, six radiopaque metallic objects, presumed to be ligation surgical clips, were observed (Fig. 1), and the left kidney was significantly enlarged compared to the right, displacing the intestines. The size of the right kidney was within normal limits. Abdominal ultrasound revealed left kidney enlargement, renal cortical atrophy, renal pelvis dilation, and proximal left ureteral dilation, confirming hydronephrosis and hydroureter (Fig. 2). The remaining ultrasound findings were clinically normal.

Figure 1. Abdominal radiographs images of lateral (A) and ventrodorsal (B) recumbency view. A round mass (edges marked by arrows) is observed in the mid-to-left caudal abdomen. Six metallic surgical ligation clips are visible.

Figure 2. Ultrasonographic images of the left kidney and left proximal ureter. (A) Dorsal view of the left kidney showing severe hydronephrosis with marked enlargement, and the renal parenchyma is almost completely lost. (B) Dilation of the left proximal ureter (arrow) is observed.

A computed tomography (CT) urography was performed to further assess anatomical abnormalities and evaluate kidney function. The dog was positioned in sternal recumbency, and an iodine-based contrast agent (2.5 mL/kg, Omnipaque; GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ) was administered intravenously before imaging. On the CT scan, the left kidney was severely enlarged (5.3×4.7×7.3 cm), and loss of renal parenchyma with severe hydronephrosis was observed (Fig. 3). The proximal left ureter (12 mm) was dilated, and the distal ureter was not visualized, with no contrast enhancement seen. The CT scan also revealed metallic surgical clips, but due to metal artifacts, image quality was compromised. No abnormalities were found in the right kidney, ureter, or bladder. Based on these findings, surgical treatment for hydronephrosis was recommended, including the removal of the surgical clip and exploratory laparotomy to clarify the diagnosis and address the left kidney’s hydronephrosis.

Figure 3. Images of computed tomography urography taken preoperatively. Coronal (A), saggital (B), and transverse (C) section of CT scan demonstrating the enlarged left kidney (asterisk) and surgical ligation clips (arrow).

One week later, surgery was performed. The dog was sedated with butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg, IV) (Butophan Inj., 1 mg/mL, Myung Moon, Korea) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg, IV) (Midazolam Inj, 1 mg/mL, Bukwang Pharm, Korea), induced with propofol (5 mg/kg, IV) (Anepol Inj., 10 mg/mL, Hana Pharm, Korea), and maintained on isoflurane with oxygen. Cefazolin (22 mg/kg, IV) (cefazoline Inj., 1 g, Chongkundang, Korea) was administered at the time of induction. Upon exploration of the abdomen, palpation of the left kidney revealed no renal parenchyma, and a fluctuant, encapsulated left kidney. While exposing the kidney for removal, surgical clips adhered to surrounding fatty tissue below the kidney was identified. Since almost no renal parenchyma remained on imaging, and severe enlargement of the left kidney was causing displacement of adjacent organs, a left nephrectomy was performed (Fig. 4A). The renal blood vessels and ureter were ligated, and the kidney was excised. A metallic surgical clip firmly adhered to the surrounding tissue was also removed (Fig. 4B). The right kidney and bladder appeared normal on gross inspection. No free fluid was observed in the abdominal cavity. The abdomen was flushed and routinely sutured, and the dog recovered uneventfully from anesthesia.

Figure 4. Operative and postoperative images of the removed hydronephrotic kidney. (A) The cystic kidney is observed. (B) Close-up image of the surgical ligation clip (arrow). (C) The excised kidney and the dilated proximal ureter (arrow). (D) Ligation clip presumed to have obstructed the proximal ureter (arrow).

On gross examination, the excised kidney showed severe atrophy of both the renal cortex and medulla. The kidney was generally enlarged, and on sagittal sectioning, only a thin renal capsule was observed. A surgical clip, typically used for vascular ligation, was found, along with another clip, suspected to have ligated the ureter, was identified (Fig. 4C, 4D). It is presumed that these clips were used to control hemorrhage during the OVH performed two years prior. The kidney tissue was submitted for histopathological examination.

The dog was hospitalized for two days postoperatively and received fluid therapy. For the subsequent seven days, the dog was prescribed tramadol (5 mg/kg, q 12 h, p.o.) (Tridol Retard Tab., 100 mg, Yuhan, Korea) and cephalexin (25 mg/kg, q 12 h, p.o.) (Falexin Cap., Dong Wha Pharm, Korea). On postoperative day 12, the skin sutures were removed, and the dog’s vital signs were normal with no abnormalities detected in its overall physical condition. Serum biochemical analysis revealed a creatinine level of 0.6 mg/dL (reference range: 0.5∼1.8) and a blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level of 16 mg/dL (reference range: 7∼27). Histopathological examination showed glomerular loss in the cortical area and separation of the cortex and medulla due to edema. Hydronephrosis was confirmed, with no signs of neoplasia or inflammation.

On postoperative day 120, no abnormalities were noted in the CBC or serum biochemical tests. One year after the surgery, the dog continued to maintain excellent health. BUN and creatinine levels remained within normal limits, as they had been preoperatively.

DISCUSSION

Ovariohysterectomy (OVH) is considered a relatively simple procedure frequently performed in small animal clinical practice (Bencharif et al., 2010; Adin, 2011). Considering the high frequency of this procedure, it is unsurprising that a wide spectrum of complications has been reported. These include hemorrhage, wound healing disorders, ovarian remnant syndrome, stump pyometra, ureteral injury, gossypiboma, and urinary incontinence (Adin, 2011; Bohling, 2020). Among these, hemorrhage is one of the most commonly encountered intraoperative complications during OVH, often occurring due to rupture of the ovarian pedicle or improper ligation of the ovarian pedicle vessels (Berzon, 1979). Several retrospective studies suggest that hemorrhage during OVH rarely leads to severe morbidity or mortality (Burrow et al., 2005; Shaver et al., 2019). Nonetheless, when intraoperative hemorrhage occurs, identifying and ligating the bleeding vessels should always be ensured, as this complication can be life-threatening and is one of the potential causes of mortality following OVH in dogs (Pearson, 1973; Bohling, 2020). Internal bleeding from inadequately ligated vessels and the resulting hypovolemic shock can be fatal (Pearson, 1973). Proper management of intraoperative hemorrhage involves identifying and correcting the source of bleeding. Additional incisions and the use of self-retaining retractors to ensure adequate visualization may be necessary to resolve the bleeding quickly and definitively, thus minimizing the risk of unintended complications, such as ureteral injury (Bohling, 2020). In the presented case, the dog underwent an OVH two years ago, during which unexpected hemorrhage appears to have occurred around the left ovarian pedicle. Given that ligation clips were observed exclusively around the left renal region, it is presumed that hemorrhage occurred near the left ovarian pedicle, and multiple surgical ligation clips were used to control it.

Direct ureteral obstruction typically occurs when the ureter is inadvertently included in a surgical ligature (Adin, 2011). The proximal ureter is more often involved due to its close anatomical relationship with the uterine body (Mehl and Kyles, 2003). This situation is similar in humans, where most ureteral injuries occur during gynecological surgeries (Elliott and McAninch, 2006). Such complications can also be prevented through careful identification of the uterine horns, uterine stump, and cervix before ligation (Howe, 2006). Despite this anatomical proximity to the urogenital tract, reports of ureteral injuries associated with OVH in dogs are limited (Adin, 2011). It is likely that this complication occurs more frequently and goes undetected, as unilateral ureteral obstruction in previously healthy animals does not typically result in azotemia (Adin, 2011). Additionally, the true incidence of ureteral injury related to OVH remains unclear, as many studies evaluating spay-related complications do not include routine abdominal imaging (Cavrenne and Mai, 2009; Mathews, 2017). In this case, it is suspected that a surgical clip used during the OVH two years prior caused an iatrogenic obstruction, leading to complete ureteral occlusion. This unilateral upper urinary tract obstruction, although causing one kidney to become non-functional, did not result in azotemia or clinical symptoms, as the contralateral kidney remained functional.

Treatment for ureteral obstruction depends on renal function and whether the obstruction is unilateral or bilateral (Mesquita et al., 2015). Unilateral lesions, if classified as end-stage hydronephrosis and the contralateral kidney is functional, can be treated with nephrectomy (Mesquita et al., 2015; Griffin et al., 2021). If preserving renal function is critical for survival, ureteral surgery may be necessary (Mesquita et al., 2015). In this case, given the absence of clinical symptoms, lack of azotemia on biochemical analysis, and the severely diminished function of the remaining kidney, nephrectomy was indicated. Histopathological findings were consistent with severe kidney atrophy along with hydronephrosis.

The main limitation of the case we reported is the uncertainty regarding the extent to which the nephrectomy contributed to the patient’s overall clinical symptoms. According to the owner, aside from abdominal distention following the OVH, there were no other significant clinical signs. Preoperative physical examination and hematological evaluations revealed no abnormalities. However, there is a risk that the hydronephrotic kidney could become infected or progress to more severe conditions such as pyonephrosis (Szatmari et al., 2001). Therefore, if the contralateral kidney is functional and the hydronephrosis is at an end stage, a preemptive nephrectomy may be indicated to prevent such severe complications.

CONCLUSION

Hemorrhage and ureteral injury are major complications during ovariohysterectomy. To prevent these, proper surgical field visualization, thorough knowledge of anatomical structures, and delicate tissue handling techniques are required. Additionally, routine abdominal imaging tests are recommended postoperatively. In cases of unilateral hydronephrosis, if the contralateral ureter and kidney are functionally normal, the prognosis after nephrectomy is generally favorable. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first reported case in which a ligation clip used during a neutering procedure led to unilateral hydronephrosis, which was subsequently surgically resected.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Abdominal radiographs images of lateral (A) and ventrodorsal (B) recumbency view. A round mass (edges marked by arrows) is observed in the mid-to-left caudal abdomen. Six metallic surgical ligation clips are visible.
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service 2024; 47: 289-295https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2024.47.4.289

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Ultrasonographic images of the left kidney and left proximal ureter. (A) Dorsal view of the left kidney showing severe hydronephrosis with marked enlargement, and the renal parenchyma is almost completely lost. (B) Dilation of the left proximal ureter (arrow) is observed.
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service 2024; 47: 289-295https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2024.47.4.289

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Images of computed tomography urography taken preoperatively. Coronal (A), saggital (B), and transverse (C) section of CT scan demonstrating the enlarged left kidney (asterisk) and surgical ligation clips (arrow).
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service 2024; 47: 289-295https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2024.47.4.289

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Operative and postoperative images of the removed hydronephrotic kidney. (A) The cystic kidney is observed. (B) Close-up image of the surgical ligation clip (arrow). (C) The excised kidney and the dilated proximal ureter (arrow). (D) Ligation clip presumed to have obstructed the proximal ureter (arrow).
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service 2024; 47: 289-295https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2024.47.4.289

Table 1 . Complete blood count (CBC), electrolyte levels, serum chemistry, and coagulation test results at the initial visit.

Blood analysisNameResultReference range
CBCWhite blood cell count (K/μL)
Neutrophils (K/μL)
Lymphocytes (K/μL)
Monocytes (K/μL)
Eosinophils (K/μL)
Basophils (K/μL)
Red blood cell count (M/μL)
Hemoglobin (G/D)
MCV (fL)
MCHC (g/dL)
11.39
9.00
1.50
0.56
0.30
0.03
8.26
19.5
66.1
35.7
5∼16.7
2.9∼11.64
1∼5
0.16∼1.12
0.06∼1.29
0∼0.1
5.6∼8.8
13.1∼20.5
61∼73.5
32∼37.9
ElectrolytesPlatelets (K/μL)
Na (mEq/L)
K (mEq/L)
Cl (mEq/L)
311
150
4.6
112
148∼484
144∼160
3.5∼5.8
109∼122
Serum chemistryGlucose (mg/dL)
Total protein (G/D)
Albumin (G/D)
Globulin (G/D)
AST (U/L)
ALT (U/L)
GGT (U/L)
ALP (U/L)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
Phosphorus (MG)
Amylase (U/L)
96
6.4
3.2
3.2
43
99
1
99
0.7
21
1.1
2.9
651
74∼143
5.2∼8.2
2.3∼4
2.5∼4.5
0∼50
10∼130
0∼11
23∼212
0∼0.9
7∼27
0.5∼1.8
2.5∼6.8
500∼1,500
Coagulation testPT (sec)
APTT (sec)
81
14
60∼93
11∼14

MCV, mean ccorpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time..


References

  1. Adin CA. 2011. Complications of ovariohysterectomy and orchiectomy in companion animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 41(5):1023-1039.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Bencharif D, Amirat L, Tainturier D. 2010. Ovariohysterectomy in the bitch. Obstet Gynecol Int 2010:542693.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Berzon J. 1979. Complications of elective ovariohysterectomies in the dog and cat at a teaching institution: clinical review of 853 cases. Vet Surg 8(3):89-91.
    CrossRef
  4. Bohling MW. 2020. Complications in spay and neuter surgery. In: White S, ed. High-Quality, High-Volume Spay and Neuter and Other Shelter Surgeries. Wiley-Blackwell; 2020: 339-361.
    CrossRef
  5. Burrow R, Cripps P. 2005. Complications observed during and after ovariohysterectomy of 142 bitches at a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Rec 157(26):829-833.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Cavrenne R and Mai W. 2009. Time-resolved renal contrast-enhanced MRA in normal dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50(1):58-64.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Elliott SP and McAninch JW. 2006. Ureteral injuries: external and iatrogenic. Urologic Clinics 33(1):55-66.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Griffin MA, Culp WTN, Munro MJL, Wanamaker MW. 2021. Surgical treatment of retroiliac ectopic ureters with secondary hydronephrosis and hydroureter in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 258(7):740-747.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Howe LM. 2006. Surgical methods of contraception and sterilization. Theriogenology 66(3):500-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Mathews K. 2017. Ureters, 2202-2218. In: Johnston SA, Tobias KM. Veterinary surgery: Small animal. 2nd ed. Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis, Misouri.
  11. Mehl M and Kyles A. 2003. Ureteroureterostomy after proximal ureteric injury during an ovariohysterectomy in a dog. Vet Rec 153(15):469-470.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Mesquita LR, Rahal SC, Matsubara LM, Mamprim MJ, Foschini CR, Kano WT. 2015. Bilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureter after ovariohysterectomy using nylon cable tie: a case report. Vet Med 60(1):52-56.
    CrossRef
  13. Pearson H. 1973. The complications of ovariohysterectomy in the bitch. J Small Anim Pract 14(5):257-266.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Pollari FL, Bonnett BN, Bamsey SC, Allen DG. 1996. Postoperative complications of elective surgeries in dogs and cats determined by examining electronic and paper medical records. J Am Vet Med Assoc 208(11):1882-1886.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Shaver SL, Hofmeister EH. 2019. Factors affecting the duration of anesthesia and surgery of canine and feline gonadectomies performed by veterinary students in a year-long preclinical surgery laboratory. Vet Surg 48(3):352-359.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Szatmari V, Manczur F. 2001. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage for treatment of pyonephrosis in two dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 218(11):1796-1799.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Şahal M, Haziroğlu R, Beyaz L. 2005. Bilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureter in a German shepherd dog. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg 52:193-196.
  18. Wajczyk T, Von Muhlen R, de Mello JR, de Carvalho TF, de Abreu Pereira J, Teixeira L, Effting AC, Coutinho DCN, Teixeira WT. 2020. Nephrectomy associated with right renomegaly in a dog affected by hydronephrosis. PUBVET 14(10):MN6664.
    CrossRef
KJVS
Dec 30, 2024 Vol.47 No.4, pp. 193~317

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in KJVS

Korean Journal of
Veterinary Service

eISSN 2287-7630
pISSN 3022-7372
qr-code Download