Quick links
Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2023; 46(4): 283-291
Published online December 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2023.46.4.283
© The Korean Socitety of Veterinary Service
Correspondence to : Jun-Gyu Park
E-mail: kingsalt@jnu.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-3591
Sang-Ik Park
E-mail: sipark@jnu.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1709-0324
†These first two authors contributed equally to this work.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Brucellosis and tuberculosis are major infectious and contagious bacterial diseases in cattle. These diseases are malicious diseases that must be inspected at the slaughterhouse of cattle in accordance with the practice of quarantine in Korea. Furthermore, both diseases lead to abortion, reproductive disorder, and calf disease, causing major difficulty in the breeding of Korean Native cattle (Hanwoo), a representative industrial animal currently being raised in Korea. Co-infections of these diseases intensify clinical symptoms such as abortion and have a particularly significant effect on increasing mortality. Thus, serological tests were performed in Hanwoo, to establish the association of co-infection between brucellosis and tuberculosis in cattle. ELISA and PCR tests were conducted on blood samples collected from a total of 102 cattle in Jeonnam province, Korea, to detect brucellosis and tuberculosis infections. The PCR results revealed that 41 samples tested positive for Brucella abortus (B. abortus) infection (40.20%), and 5 samples tested positive for Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) (4.90%) infection confirmed by PCR. Notably, 9.76% (4/41) of the cattle infected with brucellosis also tested positive for tuberculosis. In conclusion, this study highlights the co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis among Hanwoo cattle in Jeonnam province, which is expected to contribute to our understanding of disease transmission, pathogenicity, the establishment of future prevention strategies.
Keywords Brucellosis, Tuberculosis, Korean Native cattle, Hanwoo, Serological survey
Korean Native cattle (Hanwoo) is the most important breed as an economically important livestock in Republic of Korea (Korea). The reproduction of Hanwoo calves plays a significant role in overall productivity of the cattle industry. Abortion in cattle defined as the loss of a fetus, is a primary cause of reproductive losses and carries economic importance in cattle (Cabell, 2007; Hovingh et al, 2009). Most diagnosed abortions in cattle are caused by infections of bacterial, viral, fungal and protozoal agents (Anderson, 2007). Especially, brucellosis (caused by
Brucellosis, one of the most important zoonotic diseases, is caused by bacteria belonging to the genus
Tuberculosis is a chronic disease closely related to the health risks for both human and animals (Admassu et al, 2015).
The intradermal tuberculin test is considered as the diagnostic standard for this disease and is still widely used (Wood and Rothel, 1994). However, the sensitivity and specificity of this test seem to be unclear (Rothel et al, 1990). The use of the ELISA technique as a diagnostic tool for BTB detection was assessed by Ritacco in 1987, and he found that this technique has fine sensitivity and specificity for BTB detection. This finding suggests that ELISA could be a useful diagnostic tool for bovine tuberculosis detection (Lilenbaum et al, 1999).
Both diseases can be readily transmitted to humans via close contact with infected animals or animal tissue, such as placental membranes in the case of Brucellosis (Tschopp et al, 2009). Besides a public health, the presence of co-infection may indicate a possible relationship or interaction between the two disease. Cadmus et al. (2008) presented a case report on the co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in cattle slaughtered in 2008. Co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis can lead to decreased productivity, an increased risk of abortion, and reduced calving rates in cattle (Muma et al, 2013). Thus, this study was designed to investigate brucellosis and tuberculosis in Hanwoo in Jeonnam province using serological detection methods.
A total of 102 bovine blood samples were collected from Hanwoo cattle in 15 different farms located in Jeonnam province, Korea (Hampyeong, Yeonggwang, and Muan, with 15 to 20 samples per farm). These cattle had regular screenings for brucellosis and tuberculosis at the National Veterinary Services Laboratory, Jeonnam. Blood samples from the cattle were collected in vacuum tubes containing approximately 3 mL of heparin. These samples, collected between June and September 2018, were stored at −20℃ until required for testing with PCR and ELISA methods.
Buffered antigen plate agglutination test (BPAT) was performed with antigen provided by the National Veterinary Services Laboratory, Jeonnam. The preparation and evaluation of this antigen were recently described. It is an 11% suspension of
All cattle were tested through the purified protein derivatives (PPD) tuberculin test with an injection of 0.1 mL bovine PPD at caudal fold. After 48∼72 hours, the skin thickness of the inoculation site was measured, and if the difference in thick was more than 5 mm, it was considered as positive. In addition, PPD tuberculin test is a test with a lot of false negative diagnosis because it is low sensitivity and high specificity. For this reason, PPD tuberculin test is a simple test in cattle tuberculosis screening in Korea.
The ELISA protocol for brucellosis was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction (BioNote Bovine
The ELISA protocol for bovine tuberculosis was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction (BioNote Bovine TB Antibody ELISA, Korea). All samples were analyzed for the antibody test against
For negative and positive control for
DNA concentration and purity were assessed by reading NanoDrop 2000c Spectrophotometer A260 and A280. To study the influence of DNA template from clinical blood specimens, about 3 mL peripheral blood sample was collected and taken for PCR analysis. All samples were aliquot and stored at −20℃ until tested. DNA was extracted from whole blood (200 µL) with the AccuPrep® Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioneer) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
In this study, we utilized already well-known primers by extensive literature and nucleotide sequence searches in the NCBI databases. The DNA for brucellosis was then subjected to PCR detection using most sensitive primers, Mar, out of 4 primer pairs such as NES2, DET, NES1 and EFQ1 (evaluation of different primers for detection of
Table 1 . Primer sequences used in PCR experiment
Pathogen | Primer name | Primer sequence (5’→3’) | Amplicon size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|
Mar Forward | GCATTCAATCTGATGGCGTTCC | 127 bp | |
Reverse | GATCACTTAAGGGCCTTCATTGC | ||
JB2 Forward | CGTCCGCTGATGCAAGTGC | 500 bp | |
Reverse | CGTCCGCTGACCTC AAGAAAG |
Before the beginning, it is prepared completely dissolved solution of Proteinase K in 1,250 µL of nuclease-free water and RNase A in 600 µL of nuclease-free water. Then, correct amount of ethanol was added to (WA1) Buffer. For the DNA extraction from whole blood, 20 µL of Proteinase K was added into 1.5 mL or 2 mL tubes and then 200 µL of whole blood was applied each tube. After adding with 200 µL of genome binding (GB) Buffer, the samples were mixed immediately by vortex mixer and incubated at 60℃ for 10 minutes. 400 µL of absolute ethanol was added and mixed well by pipetting. The lysate was carefully transferred into the upper reservoir of the binding column tube without wetting the rim and centrifugated at 8,000 rpm for 1 minute. After the solution was discarded from collection tubes, 500 µL of washing (WA1) Buffer was added and the tubes were centrifugated at 8,000 rpm for 1 minute. With washing (W2) Buffer, the same procedure was repeated. After discarding the solution, the tubes were centrifugated again at 13,000 rpm for 1 minute to completely remove ethanol. The binding column tubes with no droplet clinging to the bottom were transferred to a new 1.5 mL tubes for elution. The tubes adding elution (EA) Buffer (50∼200 µL) were incubated at room temperature (15∼25℃) and centrifugated at 8,000 rpm for 1 minute. Concentration and purity of DNA were assessed by reading NanoDrop 2000c Spectrophotometer A260 and A280.
In order to obtain optimal amplification of target genes, we set up the condition with concentration of critical reagents such as primer, MgCl2 and template DNA and the annealing temperature of thermocycling. The PCR was performed in 25 µL volumes that contained 2.5 µL of 10× buffer, 0.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.3 mmol/L dNTPs (Fermentas, GmbH, Germany), 0.5 pmol/L from each primer, 0.2 unit of Taq DNA polymerase enzyme, and 1 µL extracted DNA (For blood sample we used 5 µL of extracted DNA). PCRs were run using the following steps: a primary denaturation for four minutes at 94℃ followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94℃ for 1 minute, annealing gradient temperature at 54℃ for 1 minute and extension at 72℃ for 30 to 60 sec. At the end, one cycle for completion of the final extension was at 72℃ for 10 minutes. Then, 10 µL of the PCR was subjected to electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel (Cinagene Co, Iran) stained by 0.5 μg of ethidium bromide/ml (Sigma, Germany) and the results were evaluated in the presence of 100 bp DNA size marker (Fermentas Co, Ukraine), visualized under UV transilluminator. Finally, amplification products were sequenced by Macrogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Comparison of sensitivity between five pairs of primers assay (MAR, JB) was conducted by using serial dilutions of DNA template (10−1–10−4) of
In order to detect co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in Hanwoo in Jeonnam province, we conducted BPAT, PPD, ELISA, and PCR amplification from a total of 102 blood samples. As shown in Table 2, positive responses of brucellosis were detected in 63 samples (61.76%) in BPAT, 56 samples (54.90%) in ELISA, and 41 samples (40.20%) in PCR from a total of 102 suspected
Table 2 . Prevlence of brucellosis and tuberculosis tested by different methods
Pathogen | Sample number | BPAT | ELISA | PCR | |||||
P | N | P | N | P | N | ||||
Brucellosis | 102 | 63 (61.76%) | 39 (38.24%) | 56 (54.90%) | 46 (45.10%) | 41 (40.20%) | 61 (59.80%) | ||
Pathogen | Sample number | PPD | ELISA | PCR | |||||
P | N | P | N | P | N | ||||
Tuberculosis | 102 | 2 (1.96%) | 100 (98.03%) | 6 (5.88%) | 96 (94.11%) | 5 (4.90%) | 97 (95.10%) |
All samples underwent analysis for brucellosis and tuberculosis. Each number of samples was considered the number of positive (P) and negative (N) reaction.
BPAT, buffered antigen plate agglutination test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPD, purified protein derivatives test; P, positive; N, negative.
For tuberculosis detection, PPD, ELISA, and PCR were performed with 102 blood samples (Table 2). Positive responses of tuberculosis were detected in 2 samples (1.96%) in PPD, 6 samples (5.88%) in ELISA, and 5 samples (4.90%) in PCR from a total of 102 blood samples. PCR test was finally performed to confirm the
Based on these results, we would like to determine the co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis. Among 5 tuberculosis-positive (
Table 3 . Co-infection of brucellosis (
Sample number | Brucellosis | Tuberculosis | Tentative Diagnosis | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAT | ELISA | PCR | PPD | ELISA | PCR | |||||
1 | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P* | ||
2 | P | P | P | N | P | P | P* | P* | ||
3 | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P* | ||
4 | N | P | P | N | P | P | P* | P* | ||
5 | N | N | N | N | P | P | N | P |
Total 5 of 6 samples were positive for tuberculosis, especially
BPAT, buffered antigen plate agglutination test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPD, purified protein derivatives test; P, positive; N, negative.
This study was designed to determine the prevalence of co-infections of brucellosis and tuberculosis in Hanwoo cattle in Jeonnam province and access the severity of pathogenicity, such as abortion and infertility. Using serological detection methods with various simplicity and specificity, we confirmed the 41 blood samples as positive for
The presence of co-infection may suggest a possible relationship or interaction between the two disease. Numerous studies have suggested that co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis are prevalent in cattle. Cadmus et al. (2008) presented a case report on co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in cattle slaughtered in 2008. In addition, co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis can lead to decreased productivity, an increased risk of abortion, and reduced calving rates in cattle (Muma et al, 2013). Furthermore, co-infection of two diseases in cattle is supposed to increase susceptibility to each disease and mortality. Particularly, the mortality rate of cattle co-infected with both diseases was 1.9 times higher than that of cattle infected only with brucellosis, and 2.4 times higher than that of cattle infected only with tuberculosis. Crucially, the mortality rate of cattle co-infected with both two diseases was 3.9 times higher than that of cattle negative for both diseases (Gorsich, 2013). Moreover, cattle with brucellosis are more susceptible to tuberculosis (Gorsich, 2013). Therefore, the detection of co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in this study is important to understand mortality and susceptibility of these diseases.
Besides serious economic impacts of both diseases on the livestock industry, brucellosis and tuberculosis can be readily transmitted to humans via direct contact with infected animals and the consumption of raw dairy products (Tschopp et al, 2009). For this reason, controlling both disease in intensive livestock production systems is essential for both human and animal health. Brucellosis and tuberculosis are important diseases that must be screened for the slaughter of cattle in accordance with the practice of quarantine in Korea (Yoon et al, 2014). In Korea, since first detection of bovine brucellosis in 1955 in imported cattle originating from the US (Hur et al, 2007), Korean surveillance program of bovine brucellosis was extended that all dairy herds were screened annually and 97% of beef herds were tested to control the incidence of human brucellosis (Ryu et al, 2019). Meanwhile, brucellosis is designated as a Class 2 legal livestock infectious disease in Korea (Jung et al, 2010). In 1913, BTB was for the first time reported in Korea (Moon, 1966). Slaughterhouse surveillance for BTB was first designated by law in 1962. In addition, a national BTB control and eradication program was established in 1964 with the implementation of field surveillance in the national cattle farm. A total of 62 animal diseases are currently designated by law of the Act on the Prevention of Contagious Animal Diseases in Korea. There are 15 diseases in Class 1 legal infectious diseases, 32 diseases in Class 2, and 21 diseases in Class 3 designated by ordinance. In addition, BTB is designated as a Class 2 legal infectious disease (Wee et al, 2010).
Based on the finding of this study, epidemiological survey of co-infections is recommended over the country in Korea. In addition, cattle showing co-infections of brucellosis and tuberculosis should be accurately identified through multiple serological tests in the methodological way. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the prevalence of co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in Hanwoo in Jeonnam province. Moreover, further academic research is needed to investigate disease transmission, epidemiological surveys, symptoms, pathogenicity, treatment and prevention.
This study was financially supported by Chonnam National University (Grant number: 2023-0874).
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2023; 46(4): 283-291
Published online December 30, 2023 https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2023.46.4.283
Copyright © The Korean Socitety of Veterinary Service.
Jun-Cheol Lee 1†, Yeong-Bin Baek 2†, Jun-Gyu Park 3*, Sang-Ik Park 2,4*
1Maum Animal Medical Center, Anyang 13913, Korea
2Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
3Laboratory of Veterinary Zoonotic Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
4College of Veterinary Medicine and BK21 FOUR Program, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
Correspondence to:Jun-Gyu Park
E-mail: kingsalt@jnu.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-3591
Sang-Ik Park
E-mail: sipark@jnu.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1709-0324
†These first two authors contributed equally to this work.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Brucellosis and tuberculosis are major infectious and contagious bacterial diseases in cattle. These diseases are malicious diseases that must be inspected at the slaughterhouse of cattle in accordance with the practice of quarantine in Korea. Furthermore, both diseases lead to abortion, reproductive disorder, and calf disease, causing major difficulty in the breeding of Korean Native cattle (Hanwoo), a representative industrial animal currently being raised in Korea. Co-infections of these diseases intensify clinical symptoms such as abortion and have a particularly significant effect on increasing mortality. Thus, serological tests were performed in Hanwoo, to establish the association of co-infection between brucellosis and tuberculosis in cattle. ELISA and PCR tests were conducted on blood samples collected from a total of 102 cattle in Jeonnam province, Korea, to detect brucellosis and tuberculosis infections. The PCR results revealed that 41 samples tested positive for Brucella abortus (B. abortus) infection (40.20%), and 5 samples tested positive for Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) (4.90%) infection confirmed by PCR. Notably, 9.76% (4/41) of the cattle infected with brucellosis also tested positive for tuberculosis. In conclusion, this study highlights the co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis among Hanwoo cattle in Jeonnam province, which is expected to contribute to our understanding of disease transmission, pathogenicity, the establishment of future prevention strategies.
Keywords: Brucellosis, Tuberculosis, Korean Native cattle, Hanwoo, Serological survey
Korean Native cattle (Hanwoo) is the most important breed as an economically important livestock in Republic of Korea (Korea). The reproduction of Hanwoo calves plays a significant role in overall productivity of the cattle industry. Abortion in cattle defined as the loss of a fetus, is a primary cause of reproductive losses and carries economic importance in cattle (Cabell, 2007; Hovingh et al, 2009). Most diagnosed abortions in cattle are caused by infections of bacterial, viral, fungal and protozoal agents (Anderson, 2007). Especially, brucellosis (caused by
Brucellosis, one of the most important zoonotic diseases, is caused by bacteria belonging to the genus
Tuberculosis is a chronic disease closely related to the health risks for both human and animals (Admassu et al, 2015).
The intradermal tuberculin test is considered as the diagnostic standard for this disease and is still widely used (Wood and Rothel, 1994). However, the sensitivity and specificity of this test seem to be unclear (Rothel et al, 1990). The use of the ELISA technique as a diagnostic tool for BTB detection was assessed by Ritacco in 1987, and he found that this technique has fine sensitivity and specificity for BTB detection. This finding suggests that ELISA could be a useful diagnostic tool for bovine tuberculosis detection (Lilenbaum et al, 1999).
Both diseases can be readily transmitted to humans via close contact with infected animals or animal tissue, such as placental membranes in the case of Brucellosis (Tschopp et al, 2009). Besides a public health, the presence of co-infection may indicate a possible relationship or interaction between the two disease. Cadmus et al. (2008) presented a case report on the co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in cattle slaughtered in 2008. Co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis can lead to decreased productivity, an increased risk of abortion, and reduced calving rates in cattle (Muma et al, 2013). Thus, this study was designed to investigate brucellosis and tuberculosis in Hanwoo in Jeonnam province using serological detection methods.
A total of 102 bovine blood samples were collected from Hanwoo cattle in 15 different farms located in Jeonnam province, Korea (Hampyeong, Yeonggwang, and Muan, with 15 to 20 samples per farm). These cattle had regular screenings for brucellosis and tuberculosis at the National Veterinary Services Laboratory, Jeonnam. Blood samples from the cattle were collected in vacuum tubes containing approximately 3 mL of heparin. These samples, collected between June and September 2018, were stored at −20℃ until required for testing with PCR and ELISA methods.
Buffered antigen plate agglutination test (BPAT) was performed with antigen provided by the National Veterinary Services Laboratory, Jeonnam. The preparation and evaluation of this antigen were recently described. It is an 11% suspension of
All cattle were tested through the purified protein derivatives (PPD) tuberculin test with an injection of 0.1 mL bovine PPD at caudal fold. After 48∼72 hours, the skin thickness of the inoculation site was measured, and if the difference in thick was more than 5 mm, it was considered as positive. In addition, PPD tuberculin test is a test with a lot of false negative diagnosis because it is low sensitivity and high specificity. For this reason, PPD tuberculin test is a simple test in cattle tuberculosis screening in Korea.
The ELISA protocol for brucellosis was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction (BioNote Bovine
The ELISA protocol for bovine tuberculosis was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction (BioNote Bovine TB Antibody ELISA, Korea). All samples were analyzed for the antibody test against
For negative and positive control for
DNA concentration and purity were assessed by reading NanoDrop 2000c Spectrophotometer A260 and A280. To study the influence of DNA template from clinical blood specimens, about 3 mL peripheral blood sample was collected and taken for PCR analysis. All samples were aliquot and stored at −20℃ until tested. DNA was extracted from whole blood (200 µL) with the AccuPrep® Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioneer) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
In this study, we utilized already well-known primers by extensive literature and nucleotide sequence searches in the NCBI databases. The DNA for brucellosis was then subjected to PCR detection using most sensitive primers, Mar, out of 4 primer pairs such as NES2, DET, NES1 and EFQ1 (evaluation of different primers for detection of
Table 1 . Primer sequences used in PCR experiment.
Pathogen | Primer name | Primer sequence (5’→3’) | Amplicon size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|
Mar Forward | GCATTCAATCTGATGGCGTTCC | 127 bp | |
Reverse | GATCACTTAAGGGCCTTCATTGC | ||
JB2 Forward | CGTCCGCTGATGCAAGTGC | 500 bp | |
Reverse | CGTCCGCTGACCTC AAGAAAG |
Before the beginning, it is prepared completely dissolved solution of Proteinase K in 1,250 µL of nuclease-free water and RNase A in 600 µL of nuclease-free water. Then, correct amount of ethanol was added to (WA1) Buffer. For the DNA extraction from whole blood, 20 µL of Proteinase K was added into 1.5 mL or 2 mL tubes and then 200 µL of whole blood was applied each tube. After adding with 200 µL of genome binding (GB) Buffer, the samples were mixed immediately by vortex mixer and incubated at 60℃ for 10 minutes. 400 µL of absolute ethanol was added and mixed well by pipetting. The lysate was carefully transferred into the upper reservoir of the binding column tube without wetting the rim and centrifugated at 8,000 rpm for 1 minute. After the solution was discarded from collection tubes, 500 µL of washing (WA1) Buffer was added and the tubes were centrifugated at 8,000 rpm for 1 minute. With washing (W2) Buffer, the same procedure was repeated. After discarding the solution, the tubes were centrifugated again at 13,000 rpm for 1 minute to completely remove ethanol. The binding column tubes with no droplet clinging to the bottom were transferred to a new 1.5 mL tubes for elution. The tubes adding elution (EA) Buffer (50∼200 µL) were incubated at room temperature (15∼25℃) and centrifugated at 8,000 rpm for 1 minute. Concentration and purity of DNA were assessed by reading NanoDrop 2000c Spectrophotometer A260 and A280.
In order to obtain optimal amplification of target genes, we set up the condition with concentration of critical reagents such as primer, MgCl2 and template DNA and the annealing temperature of thermocycling. The PCR was performed in 25 µL volumes that contained 2.5 µL of 10× buffer, 0.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.3 mmol/L dNTPs (Fermentas, GmbH, Germany), 0.5 pmol/L from each primer, 0.2 unit of Taq DNA polymerase enzyme, and 1 µL extracted DNA (For blood sample we used 5 µL of extracted DNA). PCRs were run using the following steps: a primary denaturation for four minutes at 94℃ followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94℃ for 1 minute, annealing gradient temperature at 54℃ for 1 minute and extension at 72℃ for 30 to 60 sec. At the end, one cycle for completion of the final extension was at 72℃ for 10 minutes. Then, 10 µL of the PCR was subjected to electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel (Cinagene Co, Iran) stained by 0.5 μg of ethidium bromide/ml (Sigma, Germany) and the results were evaluated in the presence of 100 bp DNA size marker (Fermentas Co, Ukraine), visualized under UV transilluminator. Finally, amplification products were sequenced by Macrogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Comparison of sensitivity between five pairs of primers assay (MAR, JB) was conducted by using serial dilutions of DNA template (10−1–10−4) of
In order to detect co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in Hanwoo in Jeonnam province, we conducted BPAT, PPD, ELISA, and PCR amplification from a total of 102 blood samples. As shown in Table 2, positive responses of brucellosis were detected in 63 samples (61.76%) in BPAT, 56 samples (54.90%) in ELISA, and 41 samples (40.20%) in PCR from a total of 102 suspected
Table 2 . Prevlence of brucellosis and tuberculosis tested by different methods.
Pathogen | Sample number | BPAT | ELISA | PCR | |||||
P | N | P | N | P | N | ||||
Brucellosis | 102 | 63 (61.76%) | 39 (38.24%) | 56 (54.90%) | 46 (45.10%) | 41 (40.20%) | 61 (59.80%) | ||
Pathogen | Sample number | PPD | ELISA | PCR | |||||
P | N | P | N | P | N | ||||
Tuberculosis | 102 | 2 (1.96%) | 100 (98.03%) | 6 (5.88%) | 96 (94.11%) | 5 (4.90%) | 97 (95.10%) |
All samples underwent analysis for brucellosis and tuberculosis. Each number of samples was considered the number of positive (P) and negative (N) reaction..
BPAT, buffered antigen plate agglutination test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPD, purified protein derivatives test; P, positive; N, negative..
For tuberculosis detection, PPD, ELISA, and PCR were performed with 102 blood samples (Table 2). Positive responses of tuberculosis were detected in 2 samples (1.96%) in PPD, 6 samples (5.88%) in ELISA, and 5 samples (4.90%) in PCR from a total of 102 blood samples. PCR test was finally performed to confirm the
Based on these results, we would like to determine the co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis. Among 5 tuberculosis-positive (
Table 3 . Co-infection of brucellosis (
Sample number | Brucellosis | Tuberculosis | Tentative Diagnosis | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAT | ELISA | PCR | PPD | ELISA | PCR | |||||
1 | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P* | ||
2 | P | P | P | N | P | P | P* | P* | ||
3 | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P* | ||
4 | N | P | P | N | P | P | P* | P* | ||
5 | N | N | N | N | P | P | N | P |
Total 5 of 6 samples were positive for tuberculosis, especially
BPAT, buffered antigen plate agglutination test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPD, purified protein derivatives test; P, positive; N, negative..
This study was designed to determine the prevalence of co-infections of brucellosis and tuberculosis in Hanwoo cattle in Jeonnam province and access the severity of pathogenicity, such as abortion and infertility. Using serological detection methods with various simplicity and specificity, we confirmed the 41 blood samples as positive for
The presence of co-infection may suggest a possible relationship or interaction between the two disease. Numerous studies have suggested that co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis are prevalent in cattle. Cadmus et al. (2008) presented a case report on co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in cattle slaughtered in 2008. In addition, co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis can lead to decreased productivity, an increased risk of abortion, and reduced calving rates in cattle (Muma et al, 2013). Furthermore, co-infection of two diseases in cattle is supposed to increase susceptibility to each disease and mortality. Particularly, the mortality rate of cattle co-infected with both diseases was 1.9 times higher than that of cattle infected only with brucellosis, and 2.4 times higher than that of cattle infected only with tuberculosis. Crucially, the mortality rate of cattle co-infected with both two diseases was 3.9 times higher than that of cattle negative for both diseases (Gorsich, 2013). Moreover, cattle with brucellosis are more susceptible to tuberculosis (Gorsich, 2013). Therefore, the detection of co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in this study is important to understand mortality and susceptibility of these diseases.
Besides serious economic impacts of both diseases on the livestock industry, brucellosis and tuberculosis can be readily transmitted to humans via direct contact with infected animals and the consumption of raw dairy products (Tschopp et al, 2009). For this reason, controlling both disease in intensive livestock production systems is essential for both human and animal health. Brucellosis and tuberculosis are important diseases that must be screened for the slaughter of cattle in accordance with the practice of quarantine in Korea (Yoon et al, 2014). In Korea, since first detection of bovine brucellosis in 1955 in imported cattle originating from the US (Hur et al, 2007), Korean surveillance program of bovine brucellosis was extended that all dairy herds were screened annually and 97% of beef herds were tested to control the incidence of human brucellosis (Ryu et al, 2019). Meanwhile, brucellosis is designated as a Class 2 legal livestock infectious disease in Korea (Jung et al, 2010). In 1913, BTB was for the first time reported in Korea (Moon, 1966). Slaughterhouse surveillance for BTB was first designated by law in 1962. In addition, a national BTB control and eradication program was established in 1964 with the implementation of field surveillance in the national cattle farm. A total of 62 animal diseases are currently designated by law of the Act on the Prevention of Contagious Animal Diseases in Korea. There are 15 diseases in Class 1 legal infectious diseases, 32 diseases in Class 2, and 21 diseases in Class 3 designated by ordinance. In addition, BTB is designated as a Class 2 legal infectious disease (Wee et al, 2010).
Based on the finding of this study, epidemiological survey of co-infections is recommended over the country in Korea. In addition, cattle showing co-infections of brucellosis and tuberculosis should be accurately identified through multiple serological tests in the methodological way. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the prevalence of co-infection of brucellosis and tuberculosis in Hanwoo in Jeonnam province. Moreover, further academic research is needed to investigate disease transmission, epidemiological surveys, symptoms, pathogenicity, treatment and prevention.
This study was financially supported by Chonnam National University (Grant number: 2023-0874).
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Table 1 . Primer sequences used in PCR experiment.
Pathogen | Primer name | Primer sequence (5’→3’) | Amplicon size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|
Mar Forward | GCATTCAATCTGATGGCGTTCC | 127 bp | |
Reverse | GATCACTTAAGGGCCTTCATTGC | ||
JB2 Forward | CGTCCGCTGATGCAAGTGC | 500 bp | |
Reverse | CGTCCGCTGACCTC AAGAAAG |
Table 2 . Prevlence of brucellosis and tuberculosis tested by different methods.
Pathogen | Sample number | BPAT | ELISA | PCR | |||||
P | N | P | N | P | N | ||||
Brucellosis | 102 | 63 (61.76%) | 39 (38.24%) | 56 (54.90%) | 46 (45.10%) | 41 (40.20%) | 61 (59.80%) | ||
Pathogen | Sample number | PPD | ELISA | PCR | |||||
P | N | P | N | P | N | ||||
Tuberculosis | 102 | 2 (1.96%) | 100 (98.03%) | 6 (5.88%) | 96 (94.11%) | 5 (4.90%) | 97 (95.10%) |
All samples underwent analysis for brucellosis and tuberculosis. Each number of samples was considered the number of positive (P) and negative (N) reaction..
BPAT, buffered antigen plate agglutination test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPD, purified protein derivatives test; P, positive; N, negative..
Table 3 . Co-infection of brucellosis (
Sample number | Brucellosis | Tuberculosis | Tentative Diagnosis | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAT | ELISA | PCR | PPD | ELISA | PCR | |||||
1 | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P* | ||
2 | P | P | P | N | P | P | P* | P* | ||
3 | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P* | ||
4 | N | P | P | N | P | P | P* | P* | ||
5 | N | N | N | N | P | P | N | P |
Total 5 of 6 samples were positive for tuberculosis, especially
BPAT, buffered antigen plate agglutination test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPD, purified protein derivatives test; P, positive; N, negative..
Cheol-Ho Kim, Yoo-Jeong Choi, Shin-Ho Lee, Dong-Hyun Han, Yoon-Ho Roh, Dong-Bin Lee, Jae-Hyeon Cho, Chung-Hui Kim
Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2023; 46(1): 67-74 https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2023.46.1.67Yeonsu Oh, Dongseob Tark, Gwang-Seon Ryoo, Dae-Sung Yoo, Woo H. Kim, Won-Il Kim, Choi-Kyu Park, Won-Keun Kim, Ho-Seong Cho
Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2023; 46(4): 293-302 https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2023.46.4.293Han Gyu Lee, Ara Cho, Yong Hoon Jung, Yoon Jung Do, Eun-Yeong Bok, Tai-Young Hur
Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2023; 46(3): 243-247 https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2023.46.3.243